The Relational Brain™ Framework

The Relational Brain™ framework reflects an ongoing synthesis of research and public scholarship exploring how relational processes shape the brain across development and context. Selected public writing, media, and talks related to this work can be found elsewhere on this site. From time to time, I share longer reflections or give small public lectures that expand on these ideas.

Relational neuroscience is organised around a set of core principles that describe how brains regulate, align, learn, and develop in relationship with other people. These principles apply across development and across contexts, from families and classrooms to teams and organisations.

Core principles of the Relational Brain™

  • Human brains regulate through other people before they regulate alone.

    From infancy, humans rely on caregivers to help modulate emotion, attention, and physiological arousal. Through repeated experiences of co-regulation—being soothed, guided, and responded to—these relational processes are gradually internalised and become what we call self-regulation.

    Relational neuroscience emphasises that self-regulation is therefore not an innate, independent skill, but a developmental outcome of repeated relational experiences. When co-regulation is absent, inconsistent, or overwhelmed, regulation becomes more effortful and fragile across the lifespan.

  • Brains function optimally when relationships feel predictable, responsive, and safe.

    Relational safety refers to the degree to which social environments are experienced as non-threatening and reliable. When relational safety is low, the brain prioritises vigilance and threat detection over learning, creativity, and flexible thinking.

    Relational safety may be expressed through secure attachment, emotional availability, and psychological safety. Across families, classrooms, teams, and organisations, it functions as a biological prerequisite for higher-order cognition and adaptive functioning.

  • Attention, motivation, memory, and meaning-making are shaped by emotional and relational context. What the brain treats as important, learnable, or worth engaging with depends on how emotionally salient and socially meaningful it feels.

    Relational neuroscience highlights that emotional processes are often regulated between people, not only within individuals, and that emotional attunement supports both regulation and learning.

  • Effective interaction depends on relational alignment — the dynamic coordination of attention, affect, timing, and expectations between people.

    Alignment is graded, context-dependent, and often asymmetric. It does not require agreement, harmony, or sameness. Rather, it requires enough coordination to support shared meaning and sustained interaction.

    One way alignment may be expressed is through synchrony — the temporal alignment of behavioural, emotional, physiological, and sometimes neural signals between interacting individuals. Research generally shows that synchrony is associated with learning, social understanding, trust, and performance, although this is an evolving area of research. Within relational neuroscience, synchrony is understood as a marker of effective relational engagement, not a guarantee of positive interaction.

  • Brain development unfolds within relationships across the lifespan.

    Early caregiving relationships play a foundational role in shaping neural systems for regulation and learning, but relational environments continue to influence plasticity, stress responses, and adaptation well beyond childhood. Development is therefore never context-free; it is embedded within families, cultures, institutions, and social systems.

  • Mismatch, misunderstanding, and misalignment are inevitable in human relationships.

    Resilience does not emerge from perfect interactions, but from processes of repair that restore regulation, trust, and alignment over time. Through repair, brains learn that relationships can tolerate rupture and recover, supporting flexibility and long-term adaptation.

Read more

“By reframing capacities typically treated as individual skills—such as self-regulation, resilience, and performance—as relationally scaffolded outcomes, the framework shifts explanatory focus from individual deficits to relational and systemic conditions.”

— Assoc. Prof. Atiqah Azhari